Fishbone Analysis in Software and IT Projects

Estimated reading: 7 minutes 8 views

Many teams begin their root cause analysis in software development by drawing a fishbone with generic categories like “People,” “Process,” and “Technology.” It looks clean, structured, and ready to use. But here’s what most miss: these categories are not universal. They’re placeholders that can lead to surface-level thinking if not adapted to the context of software delivery.

You don’t need a generic diagram. You need a tailored one. In software, the real causes of bugs, deployment failures, or performance issues often lie in the intersection of CI/CD pipelines, environment inconsistencies, or test coverage gaps. Without redefining the branches, you’re just organizing symptoms—like labeling a broken database as “people” and missing the real issue: a missing migration script in a pull request.

Over 20 years of guiding software teams through incident post-mortems has taught me one thing: the fishbone isn’t a one-size-fits-all tool. It’s a framework—one that must be reshaped for the environment. This chapter shows how to adapt the fishbone diagram for software development, using actionable methods that agile teams can apply in retrospectives, bug triage, and incident response.

Why Generic Categories Fail in Software Development

Standard fishbone templates often default to the 6Ms: Man, Machine, Method, Measurement, Mother Nature, and Maintenance. But in software, these don’t translate well. “Man” becomes vague. “Machine” might mean a server or a developer’s laptop—both critical, but for different reasons.

Instead, I recommend redefining categories around software-specific risks. Think in terms of delivery, environment, code, testing, and deployment. This shift turns the fishbone from a theoretical exercise into a practical tool for real teams.

Here’s a simple example: a production outage occurs after a deployment. The team blames “poor testing.” But is that the root cause? Not if the test suite didn’t run in the pipeline. The real cause may lie in a misconfigured CI/CD job—or a missing pre-deploy validation step.

Reimagining the Fishbone for DevOps and Agile Teams

Start by identifying the core problem: a recurring bug, a failed deployment, or a performance bottleneck. Then, tailor the main branches to your context. Here’s a revised set of categories proven effective in agile and DevOps environments:

Code Quality: Poorly written logic, lack of peer review, or inconsistent coding standards.
Testing Coverage: Missing unit or integration tests, flaky test suites, or untested edge cases.
CI/CD Pipeline: Broken build steps, missing validation gates, or environment drift.
Environment: Dev, staging, and production discrepancies or configuration drift.
Deployment Process: Manual steps, lack of rollback strategy, or insufficient pre-flight checks.
Team Communication: Misaligned handoffs, unclear ownership, or siloed knowledge.

These categories are not arbitrary. They reflect the actual workflows and failure points teams face. When you use them, your fishbone stops being a static template and becomes a living map of your software delivery system.

Applying the Agile Fishbone Diagram in Retrospectives

Agile teams don’t just fix bugs—they learn from them. The retrospective is where fishbone diagrams shine. I’ve seen teams use them to analyze sprint blockers, deployment delays, or recurring bugs in user stories.

Here’s how to run an agile fishbone session:

Define the Problem: Use a clear, measurable statement: “The team missed 3 out of 5 sprint goals in the last two sprints due to unanticipated bugs.”
Set the Timebox: 30–45 minutes. Keep it focused.
Choose the Right Facilitator: Someone not personally involved in the incidents to avoid bias.
Brainstorm Causes: Use silent brainstorming (5 minutes), then group ideas under the 6 categories.
Group and Refine: Cluster similar causes, eliminate duplicates, and ask “Why?” to drill down.
Identify High-Impact Causes: Use a dot voting system to prioritize top 2–3 root causes.

After the session, assign owners and actions for each root cause. This turns the fishbone into a roadmap for improvement.

Real Example: Fixing Recurring Deployment Failures

A DevOps team noticed deployment failures in 40% of their sprints. The problem: “Deployments to staging often fail due to missing dependencies.”

They ran an agile fishbone diagram with the following categories:

Category	Potential Causes
CI/CD Pipeline	Missing pre-deploy build step, no artifact validation
Environment	Staging environment uses outdated database schema
Testing Coverage	No integration tests for deployment scripts
Team Communication	Dev and Ops teams don’t sync on deployment changes

After analysis, they discovered the real root cause: the database migration script was not included in the CI pipeline. A simple fix—adding a pre-deploy migration check—reduced deployment failures by 75% in the next sprint.

Using Fishbone for Bug Analysis in Real Time

When a bug is reported, teams often jump straight to fixing it. But that’s not root cause analysis. It’s reactive work. The fishbone diagram for bug analysis helps teams answer: “Why did this error appear in production?”

Start by answering these questions:

When did the bug first appear?
What changed in the code or deployment?
Was the test suite run? Did it cover this scenario?
Was the environment consistent across dev and prod?

Then, use the fishbone to map possible causes. For example:

Code Quality: A recent refactor introduced a logic error in a conditional.
Testing Coverage: The test case didn’t cover the false branch.
CI/CD Pipeline: The build passed, but no integration tests ran.
Environment: The bug only occurs on servers with high load.

By answering these, you don’t just fix the bug—you eliminate its recurrence by improving testing or code review processes.

Integrating Fishbone Diagrams into Continuous Improvement

Fishbone diagrams aren’t one-time exercises. They’re part of a larger feedback loop. In agile teams, use them in:

Sprint retrospectives
Post-mortem reviews after incidents
Onboarding new team members
Planning process improvements

Each session builds a growing library of known failure modes. Over time, this helps teams detect patterns before they become incidents.

Here’s a simple checklist to ensure your fishbone analysis adds real value:

Was the problem statement specific and measurable?
Were the categories adapted to the software delivery context?
Did you drill down to a root cause using the 5 Whys?
Were actions assigned with owners and deadlines?
Was progress tracked in the next sprint or retrospective?

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the best way to start an agile fishbone diagram session?

Begin by defining a clear, specific problem statement. Avoid vague terms like “bad deployment” or “bugs everywhere.” Instead, use: “The team failed to deploy to staging in 3 out of 5 sprints due to missing configuration files.” Then, assign a facilitator and run a 5-minute silent brainstorm before grouping ideas under software-specific categories.

How does fishbone for bug analysis differ from traditional root cause analysis in IT?

Traditional root cause analysis often relies on logs or system monitoring. Fishbone for bug analysis focuses on process and human factors—like code reviews, testing gaps, or deployment handoffs. It’s more collaborative and less technical, making it ideal for cross-functional teams.

Can fishbone diagrams be used in CI/CD pipelines?

Not directly, but the insights from fishbone analysis can be used to improve pipelines. For example, if the fishbone reveals “missing pre-deploy validation,” you can add a new stage in the pipeline to check for required files, environment variables, or test coverage thresholds.

How often should teams run a fishbone analysis in software development?

At least once per sprint during retrospectives. For major incidents or recurring issues, run one after every post-mortem. Keep a log of past fishbone findings to detect patterns and prevent repeat failures.

Is fishbone diagram software development suitable for small teams?

Absolutely. Small teams can use it to focus their problem-solving. The key is to keep categories relevant—don’t force a 6M model. Use only the branches that matter to your delivery process.

What tools can I use to create fishbone diagrams for software teams?

Use digital tools like Visual Paradigm. They support team collaboration, templates, and export options.