Creating a Journey-Centric Process Repository

Estimated reading: 6 minutes 8 views

Most organizations build BPMN repositories around internal departments—Sales, Support, IT—yet customers don’t experience processes by team name. The real friction comes when stakeholders can’t find the right diagram because it’s buried under a “Support” folder, even if the journey is about onboarding or renewal. That disconnect is avoidable.

Creating a journey-centric process repository changes that. Instead of organizing by who does what, you organize by what the customer experiences. This approach turns your BPMN models into a living library of customer value—navigable, traceable, and aligned with business outcomes.

As someone who’s led CX transformation in global enterprises, I’ve seen how a well-structured repository reduces onboarding time for new team members, strengthens stakeholder alignment, and uncovers hidden process duplication. The key isn’t just the diagrams—it’s how they’re named, stored, and found.

Why Organize by Journey, Not Department?

When models are grouped by department, stakeholders often miss the bigger picture. A support agent might see “ticket resolution” as a single workflow, but the customer experiences a complex journey involving discovery, escalation, and follow-up across multiple systems and touchpoints.

Organizing BPMN diagrams by journey—like Onboarding, Support, Renewal—means every process is viewed through the lens of customer experience. This shift makes it easier to:

  • Trace how a customer moves from trigger to outcome
  • Identify handoffs between teams that create delays or confusion
  • Align process improvements with measurable CX KPIs

It transforms process modeling from an internal IT exercise into a shared conversation about how customers actually experience service.

Folder Structure: Building a Logical, Scalable Hierarchy

Your folder structure should reflect the customer journey lifecycle. Think of it as a digital filing cabinet where every drawer is a journey stage.

Here’s a simple, scalable structure I’ve used in multiple organizations:

/
├── Onboarding/
│   ├── Sign-Up-Verification.bpmn
│   ├── Account-Activation.bpmn
│   └── First-Use-Experience.bpmn
├── Support/
│   ├── Issue-Reporting.bpmn
│   ├── Escalation-Path.bpmn
│   └── Resolution-Feedback.bpmn
├── Purchase/
│   ├── Product-Discovery.bpmn
│   ├── Checkout-Process.bpmn
│   └── Post-Purchase-Confirmation.bpmn
└── Renewal/
    ├── Renewal-Reminder.bpmn
    ├── Upgrade-Offer.bpmn
    └── Churn-Prevention.bpmn

This structure maps directly to journey maps. Stakeholders can open “Onboarding” and instantly see the complete sequence of activities from first contact to successful activation—no digging through “Sales” or “Service” folders.

For larger organizations, consider adding a subfolder for channel or customer segment:

  • Onboarding / Web Self-Service
  • Onboarding / Call Center
  • Support / High-Value Customers
  • Support / Tier-1 Self-Service

This allows you to model the same journey differently based on how it’s delivered.

Naming Conventions for Journey Models

Clear, consistent naming is critical. A poorly named diagram becomes a guessing game—even for the creator.

Use this pattern:

[Journey Name] / [Sub-Stage or Event] - [Purpose or Outcome].bpmn

Examples:

  • Onboarding / Sign-Up-Verification – Email Confirmation
  • Support / Issue-Reporting – Channel Selection
  • Purchase / Checkout-Process – Payment Failure Handling

Why this works:

  • Journey name provides context
  • Sub-stage breaks down complex journeys
  • Event or purpose clarifies focus

It’s easy to scan, search, and compare. No more “Final_v2_revised.pptx” or “Process_Branch_12”. This is how you build a process repository for CX that scales with your business.

Tagging: Enriching Your Models with Metadata

Naming gets you to the right diagram. Tagging gets you to the right insights.

Assign consistent tags to each BPMN model to enable filtering and cross-referencing. Examples:

  • Journey: Onboarding, Support, Purchase
  • Channel: Web, Mobile, Call Center, In-Person
  • Customer Segment: New User, Enterprise, High-Value
  • Business Goal: Activation, Retention, Revenue
  • Model Type: Happy Path, Exception Flow, Hybrid

Use a shared, lightweight tagging system. Avoid vague terms like “important” or “urgent”. Tags should be meaningful, consistent, and reusable across the entire repository.

Pro tip: Build a tag glossary and publish it with the repository. When stakeholders know that “Happy Path” means the ideal customer journey without exceptions, they can self-serve without confusion.

Integrating with Journey Maps and KPIs

A journey-centric process repository isn’t just about diagrams—it’s about integration. You should be able to link BPMN models directly to journey maps, pain points, and performance metrics.

For example:

  • Tag a BPMN model with Pain Point: Long wait time after submission
  • Link it to a KPI: Time to First Response < 4 hours
  • Reference a voice-of-customer quote: “I didn’t know if my support ticket was received.”

These annotations don’t live in the diagram itself but are linked via metadata or embedded notes. This way, the model remains clean and readable, while the context is preserved for future review.

When a team wants to improve onboarding, they don’t just look at the BPMN—this enriched context shows them exactly where customers struggle, what’s not working, and what to fix.

Best Practices for Maintenance and Governance

Even the best structure decays without governance. A journey-centric repository must be:

  • Regularly reviewed: Every 3–6 months, evaluate whether models still reflect reality.
  • Owned by a cross-functional team: CX, IT, support, and product should co-own the repository.
  • Versioned: Use version numbers or dates in filenames (e.g., Onboarding-Activation.bpmn.2024-10-01).
  • Accessible: Provide a searchable dashboard or catalog, especially if using tools like Visual Paradigm or Camunda.

Set a rule: No new model is approved unless it’s tagged with a journey, channel, and customer segment. This enforces consistency from day one.

Key Takeaways

  • Organizing BPMN by customer journey—not department—keeps the focus on experience.
  • A clear folder structure and naming convention make it easy to find, understand, and reuse models.
  • Tagging enables filtering, searching, and alignment with CX KPIs.
  • Integrating journey maps and pain points into models turns process modeling into a strategic tool for improvement.
  • Governance ensures the repository remains useful, not outdated, over time.

By building a journey-centric process repository, you’re not just organizing diagrams—you’re building a shared language for customer experience. This is how you turn process mapping from a compliance task into a driver of real business value.

Frequently Asked Questions

How do I start organizing my BPMN models by journey?

Begin by listing your top 3–5 customer journeys. Map existing diagrams to those journeys, then rename and restructure based on the pattern: [Journey] / [Stage] – [Purpose]. Use a shared folder and tag each model consistently.

What if multiple teams are working on the same journey?

Assign one team as the primary steward, but allow co-ownership. Use shared naming conventions and a central catalog. This ensures alignment while avoiding duplication.

Can I keep both department-based and journey-based folders?

Yes, but limit this to transitional phases. Eventually, prioritize the journey-centric structure. Department-based folders should only contain supporting diagrams, not the core customer journey.

How do I ensure consistency across models?

Define and publish a lightweight modeling standards guide—including naming, tagging, and diagram layout. Share it during onboarding and reference it in your repository.

Should I include exception flows in the journey-centric structure?

Absolutely. Create sub-folders like “Onboarding / Exception Flows” or tag models with “Exception Path”. This makes it easy to find and analyze failure scenarios, which are often where CX improvements are most needed.

How do I make the repository searchable for non-technical users?

Use a web-based dashboard with filters by journey, channel, and customer segment. Add a simple search bar. Include visual thumbnails and brief descriptions to help users find what they need quickly.

Share this Doc

Creating a Journey-Centric Process Repository

Or copy link

CONTENTS
Scroll to Top